The archetype of the "Good Child" in India is not merely a social role. It is a mythological imperative. It is enshrined in the story of Shravan Kumar as the devoted son who carried his blind, aging parents in baskets slung across his shoulders. For centuries, this has been the gold standard of filial piety. ​ But in the modern clinical context, the "Shravan Kumar" complex often manifests as a pathological form of Role Enmeshment. This occurs when an adult child cannot differentiate their own physiological and emotional needs from their parents' expectations. The core cultural mandate is Seva (service), which, when taken to its extreme, requires the annihilation of the self. The "Good Child" cannot say "No." To say "No" to a parent in India is not just a refusal, it is seen as a moral failing, a betrayal of the Sanskar (values) instilled from birth. So, the mind complies. It smiles. It touches feet. It agrees to the career, the m...

I've explored some more and some lesser, will update more about these as I dig deeper https://neon.com/ https://www.sanity.io/ https://mindstamp.com/ https://dev.hume.ai/intro https://ai-sdk.dev/playground https://v0.app/ https://www.speakeasy.com/ viasocket.com https://smith.langchain.com/

 A friend recently asked me  Which I still haven't responded because it got me thinking, why do I actually offer? Let us think out loud... I offer certainty in ambiguity //Can I be more specific?  Let's say there's anything you need help with, a challenging problem, something that you aren't able to find a solution to, something that may not be your expertise? //Can I give examples? In this context, the friend who asked me is a designer, beyond the basic creative direction, art direction, I can perhaps help her create prototypes, mvps, functional prototypes, //because this is where I see a gap I can fill, but then again that's just me //if I would(which I am) how might I change the original question. I don't like spending time doing "X" is this something you may offer to help with? I get "X" kinda work but isn't really my area of expertise.... I have this idea I've been sitting on but haven't been able to materialise it, could you...

When I first joined Platformation Labs as a Design Intern in April 2020, I was still navigating design school amidst a global pandemic. Little did I know that this role would evolve into one of the most transformative experiences of my early career. The Challenge: Making Complex Platform Economics Accessible Working with Platformation Labs meant diving deep into the world of platform economics and ecosystem thinking. The challenge was significant: how do you take complex theoretical frameworks about platform business models and transform them into visually engaging, digestible content that speaks to Fortune 500 CEOs and senior policy leaders? This wasn't just about making pretty graphics. It was about reimagining tough-to-process information and creating design systems that could consistently communicate sophisticated business concepts with clarity and impact. Building a Remote Design Team During the Pandemic One of my most significant achievements was building and leading a remote...

Four years ago, I embarked on a project to merge the principles of design and nature. The goal was simple: to bring agriculture back into the city, not as a chore, but as an act of conscious creation. The old way of growing, bound by soil, space, and a constant need for attention, was a barrier. And an opportunity to apply technology to a timeless problem.  Hydroponics became the core principle. It’s a method of growing plants in water, untethered from earth. This isn't just a different technique; it's a fundamental shift. It demands 90% less water, redefines space by going vertical, and accelerates growth. The insight was this: the challenge wasn't just lack of space, but a lack of intelligent systems. The Intersection of Technology and Nature The project’s essence was a smart growing system, a fusion of hardware and software. The hardware, a compact ceramic tower, housed sensors and pumps. The software, a mobile app, was the interface to this living system. This wasn’t ab...

What makes successful products successful? What makes almost successful products fail? Is there a pattern? is there a formula that can be derived the most common and obvious objects, products or services we use? Were they always so obvious? Was there a time they didn't exist and were before becoming the obvious products we use today? I'm trying to find the common thread, a pattern, a formula, that may inform design innovation like nothing else has yet.

Symbols are something we as humans have been using since prehistoric periods, from pictograms to modern signs we see at commercial spaces, they have co-existed with us all this while. I have always felt intrigued by the fact that how some sings have the power to make me feel good or bad.  I’m more likely to smile when I see a McDonalds logo vs a Pizza Hut logo. Or the satisfaction of looking at an Apple logo vs a Toshiba logo.  When I think of Symbol Design I think of the study and research that goes behind developing a good symbol. The importance of factors like psychology, linguistics and other contextual factors that help shape a symbol from a few sketches on paper.   How to weigh in all these factors and prioritise some factors over others is another challenge I think exists. A good design perhaps should be perfect mixture of all, or a mixture of factors that suits a certain audience it is intended for.